Obstetrics

 
 APOSTEL VIII
 
 Dutch TRUFFLE
 
 2Close
 
 APRIL
 Highlow
 
 PC
 Quadruple P
 
 SIMPLE III
 
 Stop or Go?
 
 STRIDER
 
 SUGAR-DIP
 
 KEUZEHULP IMPLEMENTATIE
 
 INDEX
 MOTHER
 NethOSS
 Ppromexil-III
 ALLO
 AMPHIA
 APOSTEL-I
 APOSTEL-II
 APOSTEL-III
 APOSTEL-IV
 
 Apostel VI
 ASB
 CHIPS
 DIGITAT
 ECV Implementation
 EuFis
 Fluxim
 GlucoMOMS
 HTA Longterm conseq.
 HTA Preference study
 HYPITAT
 > HYPITAT-II
 HyRAS (Hypitat followup)
 Implementatie Tour
 IUPC
 PIMPP
 PPROMCerclage
 PPROMEXIL
 PreCare
 PROBAAT
 PROBAAT-II
 PROBAAT-S
 ProTWIN
 SimpleII
 STAN
 TeMpOH-1
 TeMpOH-3
 TOSTI
 TOTEM
 Triple P
 TRUFFLE
 WOMB study

 ABCD-study
 BIG CHANGE
 CAMPUR
 Cancer in pregnancy
 Doula study
 ECV tocolysis
 ECV Uterine relaxation
 EuroHeartSurvey
 FRUIT
 HP4ALL-PC
 HP4ALL-RS
 IMPACT
 INCAS
 IRIS
 Keizerlijk litteken
 MAKE
 OOPUS
 PRELHUDE
 PROMISES
 RAVEL
 SIMPLE
 STAN followup
 VET study
 VIS-project
 Wat bevalt beter
 ZAHARA II
 ZAHARA 3
 ZOBASII
 

 

HYPITAT-II

Hypertension and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial At near Term

Go to the Hypitat II website


Objective

Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia (PE) occur often in pregnancy, and can result in severe complications such as eclampsia, placental abruption, preterm delivery, HELLP syndrome or even intra-uterine death and maternal death. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are the largest cause of maternal mortality in the Netherlands. Recently, our group evaluated in the HYPITAT trial whether a policy of induction of labour in women with mild preeclampsia or pregnancy induced hypertension at term was superior to a policy of expectant management. In this trial, we found that induction of labour reduced the number of complications, such as severe hypertension, whereas there was no increase in caesarean section. In view of the outcome of the HYPITAT study, one can raise the question how women with preeclampsia or severe hypertension between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation should be managed. International there is a tendency for induction while in the Netherlands mostly an expectant policy is preferred. Induction of labour might prevent maternal complications and progression to a severe preeclampsia. However, late preterm births are common and associated with increased neonatal morbidity compared with births at 39 weeks. At present, there is no evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of induction of labour in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia with a gestational age of 34 - 37 weeks of pregnancy, as compared to expectant management under regular monitoring.

Study design
Multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial

Study population

Inclusion criteria

         Maternal age 18 years

         Pregnancy induced hypertension

o    100 mmHg diastolic blood pressure 110 mmHg, without medication

at two occasions at least six hours apart

o    Patients who after stabilization of the high blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg) with oral or i.v. medication reach a stable diastolic blood pressure RR 110 mmHg.

         Preeclampsia

o    diastolic blood pressure  90 mmHg

at two occasions at least six hours apart

o     0,3 g proteinuria 24 hours urine < 5 g or

o     Eiwit Kreatinine Ratio (EKR) > 30

         Chronic hypertension

o    with superimposed preeclampsia (with proteinuria as defined above) or

o    the need for additional anti-hypertensive medication started after 34 weeks (i.e. another drug than that was used before)

         Gestational age between 34+0 and 37+0 weeks

         Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Diastolic blood pressure 110 mmHg despite medication

Systolic blood pressure 170 mmHg despite medication

Renal disease

Heart disease 

Seropositive for HIV

Haemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes Low Platelets (HELLP) syndrome

Pulmonary edema or cyanosis

Proteinuria 5 g/L

Oliguria < 500 mL in 24 hours

Non-reassuring foetal heart rate, O-flow or reverse flow

Severe foetal abnormalities including abnormal karyotype.

Severe preeclamptic complaints, such as frontal headache

 

No reason for exclusion are:

Women with multiple pregnancy

Women with a child in breech presentation. (Patients can be counselled for a vaginal breech delivery or a caesarean section).

Women with a caesarean section in previous pregnancy. (Patients can be counselled for an induction of the delivery or a caesarean section. The use of prostaglandins are contraindicated. Induction should be performed by rupture of membranes or a Foley-catheter.)

Diabetes

Fetal Growth Restriction, though good fetal condition.


Intervention
Induction of labour, if necessary preceded by artificial ripening versus expectant monitoring. If there exists a contraindication for vaginal delivery, for example a breech presentation, a Caesarean section will be performed if this is agreed in by the patient and her physician.

Outcome measures


Primary outcome measure

The maternal primary outcome measure will be a composite endpoint of maternal mortality, maternal

complications (eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, pulmonary edema) and progression to severe pre-eclampsia. The neonatal primary outcome measure will be respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), which can be complicated by fetal mortality in rare cases.

Secondary outcome measures

Secondary maternal outcomes will be caesarean section rate, instrumental vaginal delivery rate, maternal quality of life and quality of recovery and costs. Secondary neonatal outcome will be neonatal morbidity defined as neonatal infection or sepsis, intravenous therapy needed hypoglycaemia, wet lung syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum, periventricular leucomalacia, convulsions and other neurological abnormalities necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) or asphyxia. Adverse neonatal outcome will be defined as a 5-minute Apgar score below 7, an umbilical artery pH below 7.05 or admission to the neonatal intensive care.


Power/data analysis

The analysis will be by intention to treat. We hypothesize that induction of labour can reduce maternal complications from 10% to 1%. Using a two sided test (alpha error 5%, beta error 20%) we need two groups of 100 patients to demonstrate such a difference. This sample size is also large enough to show whether induction of labour will cause an increase of RDS from 3% to 14% (two sided test, alpha error 5%, beta error 20%), which is within the margin of below 2% and 15% that we expect bases on the literature. Taken both the maternal and perinatal outcome in account, a sample size of 100 patients in each group.

 

Project leaders
Dr. M.T.M. Franssen, gynecologist, UMCG Veldhoven

Dr. B.W. Mol, gynecologist, AMC Amsterdam

Dr. M.G. van Pampus, gynecologist, OLVG Amsterdam

 

Health Technology Assessment
Dr. B.C. Opmeer, AMC Amsterdam

Methodology
Dr. J. Langenveld, MUMC Maastricht
           
Subsidy: Zon-Mw funding (80-8230-97-11075)

 

Contact

Drs. K. Broekhuijsen

Dept. Obstetrics/Gynecology

T: +31 6 16972879

hypitat2@studies-obsgyn.nl