Obstetrics

 
 APOSTEL VIII
 
 Dutch TRUFFLE
 
 2Close
 
 APRIL
 Highlow
 
 PC
 Quadruple P
 
 SIMPLE III
 
 Stop or Go?
 
 STRIDER
 
 SUGAR-DIP
 
 KEUZEHULP IMPLEMENTATIE
 
 INDEX
 MOTHER
 NethOSS
 Ppromexil-III
 ALLO
 AMPHIA
 APOSTEL-I
 APOSTEL-II
 APOSTEL-III
 APOSTEL-IV
 
 Apostel VI
 ASB
 CHIPS
 DIGITAT
 ECV Implementation
 EuFis
 Fluxim
 GlucoMOMS
 HTA Longterm conseq.
 > HTA Preference study
 HYPITAT
 HYPITAT-II
 HyRAS (Hypitat followup)
 Implementatie Tour
 IUPC
 PIMPP
 PPROMCerclage
 PPROMEXIL
 PreCare
 PROBAAT
 PROBAAT-II
 PROBAAT-S
 ProTWIN
 SimpleII
 STAN
 TeMpOH-1
 TeMpOH-3
 TOSTI
 TOTEM
 Triple P
 TRUFFLE
 WOMB study

 ABCD-study
 BIG CHANGE
 CAMPUR
 Cancer in pregnancy
 Doula study
 ECV tocolysis
 ECV Uterine relaxation
 EuroHeartSurvey
 FRUIT
 HP4ALL-PC
 HP4ALL-RS
 IMPACT
 INCAS
 IRIS
 Keizerlijk litteken
 MAKE
 OOPUS
 PRELHUDE
 PROMISES
 RAVEL
 SIMPLE
 STAN followup
 VET study
 VIS-project
 Wat bevalt beter
 ZAHARA II
 ZAHARA 3
 ZOBASII
 

 

HTA Preference study

 

Health Technology Assessment (HTA)

Summary
Many clinical studies in obstetrics face a multidimensional outcome, resulting in complex decisions on the design, analysis and derivation of recommendations. A prototypical outcome problem is at the core of this HTA-study.

When problems arise during third trimester pregnancy (e.g. pre-eclampsia, suspected growth retardation) the obstetrician has to choose between a watchful waiting versus an active (induction of labour) strategy. Active policy: less risk of intrauterine death, more risk on prematurity, labour complications, disadvantages of a CS; watchful waiting involves the reverse. Probabilities of these events range from rare to universal, and the weights attached to these outcomes show a broad range.

We propose to compare head-to-head methodologies in use in socalled preference and utility measurement to arrive at a prefered method to measure and analyse these multidimensional outcomes. The primary comparison will be the 'attitude' method based in psychology, applying, for short rating scales and sophisticated analysis to cover personal effects and error, and the 'preference' method based in economics, with 2 branches: indirect trade-offs with an artificial calibration scale as in time trade-off or WTP, or socalled direct discrete choice experimentation (DCE) choosing between 2 vignettes, as in conjoint analysis).

Project members
Prof. Dr. G.J. Bonsel, AMC Amsterdam
Dr. E. Birnie, AMC Amsterdam
Dr. B.W. Mol MMC Veldhoven
Drs. D. Bijlenga, AMC Amsterdam

Subsidy
ZonMw -
www.zonmw.nl

Time schedule
April 2005 to march 2008

Downloads
HTA protocol (Pdf)
HTA in de Obstetrie (Pdf) - artikel uit Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie, vol.119, oktober 2006.
When outcome is a balance - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2007, 7:10