Obstetrics
 News
 Agenda
 Documents

 APOSTEL-III
 GlucoMOMS
 INDEX
 PC
 PROMISES
 APOSTEL-IV
 Apostel VI
 EuFis
 Highlow
 MOTHER
 NethOSS
 PIMPP
 Ppromexil-III
 Quadruple P
 SimpleII
 TeMpOH-1
 TOTEM
 ECV Uterine relaxation
 HP4ALL-RS
 IRIS
 OOPUS
 PRELHUDE
 ZAHARA II
 IMPACT
 VIS-project
 ZOBASII
 Fluxim
 INCAS
 STAN followup
 ABCD-study
 CAMPUR

 FACT
 HP4ALL-PC
 SCALP
 TeMpOH-3
 TTTS1
 ZAHARA 3

 ASB
 ALLO
 AMPHIA
 APOSTEL-I
 APOSTEL-II
 BIG CHANGE
 Cancer in pregnancy
 CHIPS
 DIGITAT
 Doula study
 ECV Implementation
 ECV tocolysis
 EuroHeartSurvey
 FRUIT
 HTA Longterm conseq.
 HTA Preference study
 > HYPITAT
 HYPITAT-II
 HyRAS (Hypitat followup)
 Implementatie Tour
 IUPC
 Keizerlijk litteken
 MAKE
 PPROMCerclage
 PPROMEXIL
 PreCare
 PROBAAT
 PROBAAT-II
 PROBAAT-S
 ProTWIN
 RAVEL
 SIMPLE
 STAN
 TOSTI
 Triple P
 TRUFFLE
 VET study
 Wat bevalt beter
 WOMB study
 

HYPITAT

Hypertension and Pre-eclapmsia Intervention Trial At Term

Go to the
HYPITAT page

 

May 9 2008: First results

The first results of the Hypitat study indicate that induction of labor has multiple advantages over an expectant management in term pregnancies with pregnancy-induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia. The Hypitat symposium presentations can be found on the Hypitat website.


Objective
10% to 15% of all pregnancies are complicated by hypertensive disorders, i.e. pregnancy induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia (19.000 women per year in The Netherlands). The large majority of these cases occur at term. There is no causal treatment but termination of pregnancy. In case ofpre-term pregnancies complicated by hypertension, conservative management is advocated to as long as the risks for the mother are acceptable. However, there is no consensus whatsoever on the question in such cases at term. Induction of labour might prevent maternal and neonatal complications, but it isalso thought to increase the instrumental delivery rate. Nothing is known about the impact of both policies on the psychological well-being of the mother, as well as the costs of both. In The Netherlands in 2002, labour was induced in 9.000 women with pregnancy induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia, whereas labour started spontaneously in 10.000 women.

Study design
Multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial.

Study population
Women with a singleton pregnancy and pregnancy-induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia with a gestational age between 36 0/7 weeks and 41 0/7weeks.

Intervention
Induction of labour, if necessary preceded by artificial cervical ripening versus expectant monitoring.

Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome measure will be severe maternal morbidity, which can be complicated by maternal mortality in rare cases. Severe maternal morbidity will be defined as diastolic BP >= 110 mmHg, systolic BP >= 170 mmHg, major postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss > 1000 ml within 24 hours after delivery), eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, pulmonary edema, trombo-embolic disease and/or abruptio placentae.

Secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes will be neonatal mortality or neonatal morbidity, caesarean section rate, instrumental vaginal delivery rate, maternal quality of life and quality of recovery and costs. Adverse neonatal outcome will be defined as a 5-minute Apgar score below 7, an umbilical artery pH below 7.05 or admission to the neonatal intensive care.


Power/data analysis
The analysis will be by intention to treat. The aim of induction of labour is to reduce the rate of severe complications of hypertensive disease. In women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at term (>36 weeks), the prevalence of such complications in 2003 and 2004 was 12%. To our opinion, the disadvantages of induction of labour outweigh the advantages when the complication rate is reduced to 6%. In order to detect such a difference, we will need two groups of 360 patients (two-sided test, alpha .05; beta .80). In anticipation of equivalence in maternal and neonatal outcome and quality of life the economic analysis will be a cost-minimisation analysis. For each of the two strategies, will calculate costs of perinatal care for mother and child.

Time schedule
Total study time 36 months. Preparation three months, recruitment 27 months, analysis and report six months. Both data analysis and economic analysis will be performed within thecontext of a consortium of perinatal centres that are already collaborating in the Zon-MW fundedDIGITAT-study (Zon-MW 945-04-558).

Projectleaders
Dr. M.G. Van Pampus, gynaecologist, UMCG Groningen
Dr. B.W. Mol, gynaecologist, MMC Veldhoven

Health Technology Assessment
Prof. Dr. G.J. Bonsel, AMC Amsterdam

Methodology
Dr. S. Le Cessie, epidemiologist LUMC
Dr. E. Birnie, health economist, AMC
Drs. D. Bijlenga, AMC
Drs. C.M. Koopmans, UMCG
Drs. S.M.C.Vijgen, AMC

Subsidy
ZonMw -
www.zonmw.nl