Obstetrics

 
 APOSTEL VIII
 
 Dutch TRUFFLE
 > 2close
 
 APRIL
 Highlow
 
 PC
 Quadruple P
 
 SIMPLE III
 
 Stop or Go?
 
 STRIDER
 
 SUGAR-DIP
 
 KEUZEHULP IMPLEMENTATIE
 
 INDEX
 MOTHER
 NethOSS
 Ppromexil-III
 ALLO
 AMPHIA
 APOSTEL-I
 APOSTEL-II
 APOSTEL-III
 APOSTEL-IV
 
 Apostel VI
 ASB
 CHIPS
 DIGITAT
 ECV Implementation
 EuFis
 Fluxim
 GlucoMOMS
 HTA Longterm conseq.
 HTA Preference study
 HYPITAT
 HYPITAT-II
 HyRAS (Hypitat followup)
 Implementatie Tour
 IUPC
 PIMPP
 PPROMCerclage
 PPROMEXIL
 PreCare
 PROBAAT
 PROBAAT-II
 PROBAAT-S
 ProTWIN
 SimpleII
 STAN
 TeMpOH-1
 TeMpOH-3
 TOSTI
 TOTEM
 Triple P
 TRUFFLE
 WOMB study

 ABCD-study
 BIG CHANGE
 CAMPUR
 Cancer in pregnancy
 Doula study
 ECV tocolysis
 ECV Uterine relaxation
 EuroHeartSurvey
 FRUIT
 HP4ALL-PC
 HP4ALL-RS
 IMPACT
 INCAS
 IRIS
 Keizerlijk litteken
 MAKE
 OOPUS
 PRELHUDE
 PROMISES
 RAVEL
 SIMPLE
 STAN followup
 VET study
 VIS-project
 Wat bevalt beter
 ZAHARA II
 ZAHARA 3
 ZOBASII
 


2Close


Single versus double layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development.

Go to the 2Close website

Objective
Double layer closure compared to single layer closure of the uterus after a caesarean section (CS) leads to a thicker myometrial layer at the site of the CS scar (residual myometrium) and possibly decreases the development of niches. A niche is a CS defect at the site of the uterine scar and is associated with gynaecological symptoms including postmenstrual spotting (OR 3.1 (1.5-6.3)). It is also associated with failure of trial of labour after CS and possibly with subfertility. In the Netherlands single layer closure of the uterus is performed by 92% of the gynaecologists.

We hypothesize that double layer closure of the uterine scar using unlocked continuous running sutures reduces menstrual disorders and pain and subfertility in relation to niche development and increases QOL and improves sexual functioning, compared to single layer closure.


Study design
Cost effectiveness analysis alongside multicenter randomised controlled trial (superiority). Patients and ultrasound examiners will be blinded for allocation.

Study population
Inclusion criteria:
  •  Patients undergoing their first caesarean section.
  •  Sufficient command of the Dutch language
  •  > 18 years old
Exclusion criteria:
  • Inadequate possibility for counseling (e.g. indication for emergency CS, severe pain without accurate therapy) if patients were not informed about the study earlier in the pregnancy
  • Previous uterine major surgery (e.g. laparoscopic or laparotomic fibroid resection, septum resection)
  • Patient with known cause of menstrual disorder (cervical dysplasia, communicating hydrosalpinx, uterine anomaly or endocrine disorders disturbing ovulation
  • Placenta in- or percreta in current pregnancy
  • 3 or more fetus in current pregnancy
Intervention
Double layer closure (unlocked) continuous running suture of the uterus using multifilament material (instructed by e-learning) compared with usual (single layer) closure of the uterus, using a continuous running multifilament suture.

Outcome measures
Primary outcome: post- and intermenstrual spotting 9 months after randomization. Secondary outcome: menstrual pattern (score card) and dysmenorrhoe (VAS), Quality of life (SF36 & EQ-5D-5L), societal reintegration (PROMIS), sexual function (FSFI), Niche (characteristics), complications, surgery time and costs, % of ongoing pregnancies, life birth rate and time to conceive in women willing to conceive.

Power/data analysis
We use a superiority design. Literature for making reliable estimations is scarce. We have used baseline data from the HysNiche study and preliminary data of a retrospective study among women that had a CS or vaginal delivery in 2011 in the VU Medical Centre or Deventer Ziekenhuis. We estimate that in the total group the average number of spotting days is 3.5 days/month. We consider a 15% reduction in the number of spotting days clinically relevant (average 0,5 day/month/woman reduction). Assuming a SD of 3.4 and predefining the p-value on 0.05, taking into account a non-normal distribution 1946 women are needed to achieve a power of 0.90. Increasing the sample size to take into account 15% of women unevaluable for the primary outcome, 2290 women need to be included.


Economic evaluation
Both a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be performed with a time horizon of 9 months to relate the difference in societal and healthcare costs between double layer and single layer unlocked uterine closure during a caesarean section to the difference in clinical effects.

Time schedule
48 months; 6 months preparation, 24 months inclusion, 6 months analysis and report.

Projectleaders
Dr. J.A.F. Huirne, gynaecologist, VUmc Amsterdam
Prof. dr. C.J.M. de Groot, gynaecologist (obstetrics), VUmc Amsterdam
Prof. dr. C.B. Lambalk, gynaecologist (fertility), VUmc Amsterdam

Health Technology Assessment
Dr. J.E. Bosmans, assistant professor, Afd. Gezondheidswetenschappen VU

Methodology
Dr. S.E. Zwolsman, clinical epidemiologist, AMC Amsterdam

Subsidy
ZonMw www.zonmw.nl

Contact (researcher)

Drs. Sanne Stegwee
PhD candidate, VUmc Amsterdam
Tel: 06-19196752 Email: s.stegwee@vumc.nl